A Critical Analysis of the Liberal International Order
From Hegemony to Multipolarity
Abstract
People generally understand that the liberal international system came about after World War II and reached its peak around 1990. As the Soviet Union or what is called the Eastern campus fell apart, it paved the way for the US-led Western nations to take over and become the main driving force in international politics, changing the dynamics of the international system, and shifting the way things work on the global stage, moving from a bipolar into a unipolar system, making the United States the sole power. In addition, spreading the political and economic principles of liberal international order where the foundation of the system is shaped by these two
fundamental pathways. However, over the last few years, the United States has encountered certain difficulties in upholding its dominance and advocating for its established system. The economic path might be manageable, but the political approach of democratic peace seems to be creating more divisions around the world. Difficulties, such as the emergence of influential regional players such as China and Russia, as well as the war in Ukraine, which is not just a regional conflict but a trial for the position of the existing global system. Therefore, the paper sheds light on the challenges confronting the current international order and the role of American leadership by analyzing historical developments, geopolitical dynamics, and ideological shifts, and the paper aims to illuminate the intricacies of this transition.
Downloads
References
Alstyne, R.W. (1961). Woodrow Wilson and the Idea of the Nation State. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 37, 293-308.
Blum, W. (2013). America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy: The Truth About US Foreign Policy, and Everything Else. United Kingdom: Zed Books.
Charney, J.I. (2001). The use of force against terrorism and international law. American Journal of International Law, 95(4), 835-839.
Chomsky, N. (2003). Wars of terror. New Political Science, 25, 113–127.
Clark, I. (2011). Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, V.B. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Cumings, B. (1999). Still the American Century. Review of International Studies, 25, 271-299.
Furedi, F. (2022). Illiberal liberalism: A genealogy. The Journal of Illiberalis Studies, 2(2), 19-36.
Garton, T. (2005). Free World: America, Europe, and the Surprising Future of the West. United States: Vintage Books.
Gilpin, R. (1983). War and Change in World Politics. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Ikenberry, D.D. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal International order. Review of International Studies, 25, 179-196.
John Ikenberry, M.M. (2009). Introduction: Unipolarity, state behavior, and systemic consequences. World Politics, 61, 1-27.
Keohane, J.D. (2017). The liberal order is rigged: Fix it now or watch it wither. Foreign Affairs, 96(3), 36-40, 42-44.
Kimble, S.H. (2018). Enduring Ideals: Rockwell, Roosevelt and the Four Freedoms Exhibition Catalog. New York: Abbeville Press.
Kristol, R.K. (2000). Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in Americas Foreign and Defense Policy. New York: Encounter Books.
Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Makei, V.V. (2023). Liberal international order: Can it be saved in today’s nonhegemonic world? Russia in Global Affairs, 21, 114-130.
Mastanduno, M. (2009). System maker and privilege taker. World Politics, 61, 121-154.
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2014). America unhinged. The National Interest, 129, 9-30.
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. United States: Harvard University Press.
Nesmashnyi, A.D. (2023). European security crisis and U.S. Hegemony: Reversing the decline? Russia in Global Affairs, 21, 135-152.
Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Working Paper No. RWP16-026. Harvard Kennedy School.
Rajan, M.S. (1959). United States attitude toward domestic jurisdiction in the United Nations. International Organization, 13, 19-37.
Reuters. (2023). What is BRICS, Which Countries Want to Join and Why? Reuters. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/world/what-is-brics-whoare-its-members-2023-08- /#:~:text=over%2040%20countries%2c%20including%20iran,2023%20summit%20chair%20south%20africa [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 30].
Ruggie, J.G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36, 379-415.
Ruggie, J.G. (1992). Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization, 46, 561-598.
Sachs, J.D. (2018). A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sajadi, D. (2022). Mishandling of COVID-19 pandemic: A challenge to the International order. Eurasian Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2, 44-53.
Sakwa, R. (2023). Crisis of the International system and International politics. Russia in Global Affairs, 21, 70-91.
Simma, B. (1999). NATO, the UN and the use of force: Legal aspects. European Journal of International Law, 10, 1-22.
Smith, T. (2012). America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy. United States: Princeton University Press.
Tyler, P.E. (1992). U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop. The New York Times Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/world/us-strategy-plan-calls-for-insuring-no-rivals-develop.html [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 30].
United Nation. (2007). Responsibilty to Protect. United Nation: Available from: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/about-responsibility-to-protects.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 10].
Wallander, C.A. (2000). Institutional assets and adaptability: NATO after the cold war. International Organization, 54, 705-735.
Walzer, M. (2015). Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.
Wei, L. (2022). China Declared Its Russia Friendship Had ‘No Limits’. It’s Having Second Thoughts. Wall Street Journal. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-russia-xi-putin-ukraine-war-11646279098 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 10].
Wilson, W. (1917). April 2, 1917: Address to Congress Requesting a Declaration of War Against Germany. Miller Center. Available from: https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/april-2-1917-address-congress-requestingdeclaration-war [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 30].
Copyright (c) 2025 Dana M.D. Sajadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
