Employee Perception of Ethical Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Performance
The Role of Intellectual Capital, and Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior
This study's purpose is to find out how perceived ethical corporate social responsibility (ECSR) and organisational performance are related, specifically through the use of employees’ innovative work behaviour (IWB) as a mediating mechanism that is conditional (i.e., moderator) upon intellectual capital. Employees in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq's services industry, such as those working for hotels, banks, real estate, and property organisations, were given questionnaires through a simple random sample approach. The final sample used for the study had 172 responses, and the achieved response rate was 78.2 percent. The research showed that workers’ IWB mediates the association between perceived ECSR and organisational performance. The outcomes also lend credibility to the argument that ECSR interacts with the intellectual capital to influence employees’ IWB, which impacts organisational performance. This paper is one of the few studies examining the effects of ECSR, intellectual capital, and employees’ IWB on organisational performance.
Abdullah, M.I., Ashraf, S., & Sarfraz, M. (2017). The organizational identification perspective of CSR on creative performance: The moderating role of creative self-efficacy. Sustainability, 9(11), 2125-2146.
Abualoush, S., Bataineh, K., Alrowwad, A., & Masa’deh, R. (2018). The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279-309.
Abualoush, S.H., Obeidat, A.M., Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R., & Al-Badi, A. (2018). The role of employees’ empowerment as an intermediary variable between knowledge management and information systems on employees’ performance. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(2), 217-237.
Afridi, S.A., Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A., Rehman, Z.U., Haider, M., & Ullah, M. (2020). Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 27(4), 1865-1877.
Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M.J., & Hussain, S.T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129.
Alhmoudi, R.S., Singh, S.K., Caputo, F., Riso, T., & Iandolo, F. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: Is it a matter of perceptions? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29, 2030-2037.
Al-Salami, Q.H., Saadi, I.A., Sawadi, Z.T., & Saleh, R.K. (2019). The factors affecting customer relationship management implementation at DHL company in Baghdad, Iraq. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities Social Sciences,3(1), 43-51.
Arain, G.A., Bhatti, Z.A., Hameed, I., & Fang, Y.H. (2020). Top-down knowledge hiding and innovative work behavior (IWB): A three-way moderated-mediation analysis of self-efficacy and local/foreign status. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), 127-149.
Aramburu, I.A., & Pescador, I.G. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating effect of reputation in cooperative banks versus commercial banks in the Basque country. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 701-719.
Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278-287.
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J.B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3305-3325.
Barrena-Martínez, J., Cricelli, L., Ferrándiz, E., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2020). Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm. Journal of Business Research, 112, 261-270.
Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2017). CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts: A firm-level empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 241-254.
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.
Busch, T., & Schnippering, M. (2022). Corporate social and financial performance: Revisiting the role of innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 29(3), 635-645.
Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. (2018). How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 621-648.
Caligiuri, P., Mencin, A., & Jiang, K. (2013). Win-win-win: The influence of company-sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 825-860.
Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carroll, A.B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 3.
Chahal, H., & Bakshi, P. (2015). Examining intellectual capital and competitiveadvantage relationship: Role of innovation and learning culture. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(3), 376-399.
Chou, C.Y., Huang, C.H., & Lin, T.A. (2018). Organizational intellectual capital and its relation to frontline service employee innovative behavior: Consumer value co-creation behavior as a moderator. Service Business, 12(4), 663-684.
Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270-274.
Dabić, M., Lažnjak, J., Smallbone, D., & Švarc, J. (2019). Intellectual capital, organisational climate, innovation culture, and SME performance: Evidence from Croatia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(4), 522-544.
Delaney, J.T., & Huselid, M.A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
Dhir, S., Dutta, T., & Ghosh, P. (2020). Linking employee loyalty with job satisfaction using PLS-SEM modelling. Personnel Review, 49(8), 1695-1711.
Dögl, C., & Holtbrügge, D. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility, employer reputation and employee commitment: An empirical study in developed and emerging economies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1739-1762.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 57(9), 1528-1545.
Edwards, J.R., & Lambert, L.S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
Engelen, A., Weinekötter, L., Saeed, S., & Enke, S. (2018). The effect of corporate support programs on employees’ innovative behavior: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 230-253.
Farrukh, M., Meng, F., Raza, A., & Wu, Y. (2022). Innovative work behaviour: The what, where, who, how and when. Personnel Review, 52, 74-98.
Fitrio, T., Budiyanto, B., & Agustedi, A. (2020). The rule of organizational citizenship behavior and innovative work behavior in mediating the influence of organizational commitment and culture to employee performance Accounting, 6(7), 1351-1360.
Gao, Y., Zhang, D., & Huo, Y. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and work engagement: Testing a moderated mediation model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(5), 661-673.
Garcia-Morales, V.J., Martín-Rojas, R., & Lardón-López, M.E. (2018). Influence of social media technologies on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(3), 345-367.
Gerhart, B., & Feng, J. (2021). The resource-based view of the firm, human resources, and human capital: Progress and prospects. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1796-1819.
Gupta, K., & Raman, T.V. (2021). Influence of intellectual capital on performance: An analysis of IT and pharmaceutical firms. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 12(2), 53-71.
Hughes, M., Rigtering, J.P.C., Covin, J.G., Bouncken, R.B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750-768.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational Organizational and Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Karam, A.A., & Kitana, A.F. (2021). Using PLS-SEM approach to estimate corporate social responsibility and precautionary measures of Covid-19: Effects on employees commitment. Arab Journal of Administration, 41, 333-352.
Khaskheli, A., Jiang, Y., Raza, S.A., Qureshi, M.A., Khan, K.A., & Salam, J. (2020). Do CSR activities increase organizational citizenship behavior among employees? Mediating role of affective commitment and job satisfaction. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2941-2955.
Kim, K.H., Kim, M., & Qian, C. (2018). Effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A competitive-action perspective. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1097-1118.
Leong, C.T., & Rasli, A. (2014). The relationship between innovative work behavior on work role performance: An empirical study. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences, 129, 592-600.
Lianto, B., Dachyar, M., & Soemardi, T.P. (2018). Continuous innovation: A literature review and future perspective. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology, 8(3), 771-779.
Lin, C.P., Lyau, N.M., Tsai, Y.H., Chen, W.Y., & Chiu, C.K. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 357-372.
Lu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Ahmed, R.R., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Modified Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility to enhance organizational performance of SMEs industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122456.
Mahmood, N.H., Yahya, R.O., & Aziz, S.J. (2022). Apply binary logistic regression model to recognize the risk factors of diabetes through measuring glycated hemoglobin levels. Cihan University-Erbil Scientific Journal, 6(1), 7-11.
Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57-72.
Masoud, N. (2017). How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: The International Pyramid Model of CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2(4), 4-22.
Massoudi, A.H., & Fatah, S.J. (2021). Advancing small and medium-size enterprises’ performance by adopting marketing and service innovation. International Journal of Procurement Management, 14(6), 742-758.
Massoudi, A.H., Jameel, A.S., & Ahmad, A.R. (2020). Stimulating organizational citizenship behavior by applying organizational commitment and satisfaction. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 2(2), 20-27.
McDowell, W.C., Peake, W.O., Coder, L., & Harris, M.L. (2018). Building small firm performance through intellectual capital development: Exploring innovation as the “black box”. Journal of Business Research, 88, 321-327.
Nejati, M., Amran, A., & Ahmad, N.H. (2014). Examining stakeholders’ influence on environmental responsibility of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and its outcomes. Management Decision, 52(10), 2021-2043.
Nguyen, T.T.H., Pham, T.T.H., Le, Q.B., & Van Anh Bui, T. (2020). Impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment through organizational trust and organizational identification. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3453-3462.
Nirino, N., Ferraris, A., Miglietta, N., & Invernizzi, A.C. (2020). Intellectual capital: The missing link in the corporate social responsibility-financial performance relationship. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 420-438.
Obeidat, B.Y., Abdallah, A.B., Aqqad, N.O., Akhoershiedah, A.H.O.M., & Maqableh, M. (2016). The effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Communication and Network, 9(1), 1-27.
Oppi, C., Bagheri, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2020). Antecedents of innovative work behaviour in healthcare: Does efficacy play a role? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(1), 45-61.
Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664-1676.
Padilla-Lozano, C.P., & Collazzo, P. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness-causality in manufacturing. Competitiveness Review, 32, 21-39.
Pan, X., Sinha, P., & Chen, X. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and: The triple bottom line perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 28(1), 214-228.
Sanz-Valle, R., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2018). HRM and product innovation: Does innovative work behaviour mediate that relationship? Management Decision, 56(6), 1417-1429.
Sellitto, M.A., Camfield, C.G., & Buzuku, S. (2020). Green innovation and competitive advantages in a furniture industrial cluster: A survey and structural model. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 23, 94-104.
Servera-Francés, D., & Piqueras-Tomás, L. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer loyalty through consumer perceived value. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 66-84.
Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B.I.J., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67-77.
Shareef, R.A. (2023). Managing logistics activities for improving business performance. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities Social Sciences, 7(1), 42-49.
Shareef, R.A., & Atan, T. (2019). The influence of ethical leadership on academic employees’ organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention: Mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Management Decision, 57(3), 583-605.
Shujahat, M., Sousa, M.J., Hussain, S., Nawaz, F., Wang, M., & Umer, M. (2019). Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledgebase innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity. Journal of Business Research, 94, 442-450.
Sivalogathasan, V., & Wu, X. (2015). Impact of organization motivation on intellectual capital and innovation capability of the textile and apparel industry in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Innovation Science, 7(2), 153-168.
Smriti, N., & Das, N. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: A study of Indian firms listed in COSPI. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 935-964.
Stewart, G. (1997). Supply-chain operations reference model (SCOR): The first cross-industry framework for integrated supply-chain management. Logistics Information Management, 10(2), 62-67.
Stojanovic, A., Milosevic, I., Arsic, S., Urosevic, S., & Mihajlovic, I. (2020). Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of employee loyalty and business performance. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(2), 149-166.
Suprapti, S., Asbari, M., Cahyono, Y., Mufid, A., & Khasanah, N.E. (2020). Leadership style, organizational culture and innovative behavior on public health center performance during Pandemic Covid-19. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Research, 1(2), 76-88.
Thneibat, M.M., & Sweis, R.J. (2022). The impact of performance-based rewards and developmental performance appraisal on innovation: The mediating role of innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Wang, Y. (2018). Perception of CSR and its Consequences a Literature Review. In: Paper Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Judicial, Administrative and Humanitarian Problems of State Structures and Economic Subjects (JAHP 2018).
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
West, M.A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In: Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. Oxford, England: John Wiley and Sons. p309-333.
Wikhamn, W., Armbrecht, J., & Wikhamn, B.R. (2018). Innovation in Swedish hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(6), 2481-2498.
Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., & Zhu, W. (2018). Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 15(2), 268.
Xerri, M.J., & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163-3177.
Zheng, Q., Luo, Y., & Maksimov, V. (2015). Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 389-403.
Copyright (c) 2023 Raad A. Shareef
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).