بنەما سەرەکییەکانی داڕشتنی گوتاری دیپلۆماسی لە گوتارەکانی سەرکردە ناوخۆی و نێودەوڵەتییەکان

Hawkar H. F. Hassan; Abdullah H. Rasul

doi:10.24086/cuejhss.v9n2y2025.pp55-60

Authors

Hawkar H. F. Hassan Kurdish department, College of languages, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2871-8295
Abdullah H. Rasul Kurdish Department, College of Languages, Salahaddin University – Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6629-3920

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v9n2y2025.pp55-60

Keywords:

Diplomatic discourse, principles, clarity, ambiguity, cultural sensitivity

Abstract

Diplomatic discourse plays a vital role in shaping international relations, facilitating negotiation, conflict resolution, and fostering cooperation among nations. This article explores the foundational principles of diplomatic discourse clarity, politeness, strategic ambiguity, and cultural sensitivity and examines how they influence the success of diplomatic engagements. Through selected speeches by global leaders such as Barack Obama, Massoud Barzani, Masrour Barzani, Vladimir Putin, and Nelson Mandela, the analysis highlights how language is used to build trust, convey political intent, and align interests across cultural and ideological divides. For instance, Barack Obama’s speeches emphasize inclusivity and moral authority, often appealing to shared democratic values. Massoud Barzani and Masrour Barzani demonstrate how national identity and regional stability are framed through respectful yet assertive discourse. Vladimir Putin's language reflects power dynamics and national sovereignty, using calculated rhetoric to project strength. Nelson Mandela’s discourse, rich in reconciliation and unity, exemplifies how empathetic language can transform post-conflict societies. These examples reveal that effective diplomatic discourse is not merely about eloquence but about crafting messages that resonate with diverse audiences while serving specific strategic goals. In an increasingly interconnected world, mastering diplomatic language is essential for leaders seeking peaceful solutions and sustainable international partnerships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hawkar H. F. Hassan, Kurdish department, College of languages, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Hawkar Hamafaraj Hassan is a Ph.D. student in the Kurdish Department at the College of Languages, Salahaddin University – Erbil. His academic interests focus on applied linguistics, with a particular specialization in political and diplomatic language.

Abdullah H. Rasul, Kurdish Department, College of Languages, Salahaddin University – Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Abdullah Hussein Rasul is a lecturer in the Kurdish Department at the College of Languages, Salahaddin University – Erbil. He is an experienced academic and supervisor, having guided numerous graduate students at both the master's and doctoral levels. Dr. Rasul is recognized for his contributions to Kurdish language studies and his dedication to advancing research in linguistics and literary analysis.

References

Ali, K. (2022). Symbolism in International Relations. Beirut: Dar Al-Nahar.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Hall, E. T. (1990). The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Harrison, M. (2015). Body Language in Diplomacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jami, M. S., Massoudi, A. H., & Al-Salami, Q. H. (2023). Ethical leadership role in job embeddedness and job involvement‎. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 11-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v7n1y2023.pp11-15

Jones, S. (2021). Language and Power in International Relations. New York: Routledge.

Kennedy, Michael. (2018). Pragmatics of Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the Cold War. Global Political Discourse Quarterly, 8(4), pp. 89–112.

Levinson, S. C. (1987). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mahdi. I. (2012). Influence of the dominant strategic power in political Speech A practical Study in Obamas political Speech, Alustath journal for human and social sciences, 200, 900-912.

Massoudi, A. (2024). The Mediating Effect of Occupational Stress between Paradoxical Leader and Compulsory Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Studies and Innovation, 11(3), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51659/josi.23.207

Massoudi, A. H., Agha, A. M., & Zamoum, K. (2025). Bridging AI Marketing and Customer Loyalty. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 106-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v9n1y2025.pp106-113

Peterson, R. (2017). The Voice of Diplomacy. New York: Springer.

Smith, J. (2020). Ambiguity and Clarity in Diplomatic Language. London: Sage.

First speech, Masrour Barzani: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9YLk2QkzOg.

Second Speech 2, Nelson Mandela: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJiXu4qVU.

Third speech, Vladimir Putin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l10BsQzOGKM

Fourth speech, Barack Obama: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/issues/foreign-policy/presidents-speech-cairo-a-new-beginning.

Fifth speech, Massoud Barzani: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3IFPb0wm-A

Sixth speech, Barack Obama: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIyH98GN9DA

Seventh speech, Angela Merkel: https://judithknott.com/2017/05/04/merkels-7april-speech-to-the-bundestag full-translation.