Beyond Efficiency: A Conceptual Design Framework for Sustainable Housing in Erbil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24086/cuesj.v9n2y2025.pp80-91Keywords:
Sustainability, sustainable housing, Middle East region, conceptual design framework, context of ErbilAbstract
Housing development plays a vital role in achieving sustainability goals as it is intrinsically tied to family life and faces numerous environmental challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reshaped our understanding of home. While always a place of shelter and personal connection, the home has evolved into a truly multi-functional space. In the Middle East, a divergence in approaches to sustainability is evident, particularly in the application of resource efficiency. While certain nations have undertaken significant initiatives, cities like Erbil are still in the early stages of addressing sustainability concerns. The transition to sustainable housing can be accelerated by adopting efficient regional practices. This study aims to expand sustainable housing practices in the Middle East, fostering a deeper connection with nature while aligning with the global evolution of the home concept. A conceptual design framework is developed for application within the context of Erbil. A qualitative research method based on case analysis is adopted to achieve the study’s objectives.
Downloads
References
1. M. Aresta and N. A. Salingaros. The importance of domestic space in the times of COVID-19. Challenges, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 27, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/challe12020027
2. N. Yahya and B. Hassanpour. A methodical framework for sustainable architectural design: Housing practice in the middle east. Land, vol. 11, p. 1019, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071019
3. R. Lorch. Sustainable development and regionalism. Building Research and Information, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 393-396, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500239608
4. K. Elgendy. A Review of Sustainable Design in the Middle East. Carboun, 2018. Available from: https://www.carboun.com/sustainable-design/sustainability-in-the-desert [Last accessed on2025 May 06].
5. D. Orr. Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Post- Modern World. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1992.
6. A. Istiadji, G. Hardiman and P. Satwiko. What is the sustainable method enough for our built environment? In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 213, no. 1, p. 012016, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012016
7. S. Kellert. Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: Biophilic Design. John Wiley and Sons, United States, pp. 3-20, 2008.
8. P. Macnaghton and J. Urry. Contested Natures. Sage, London, pp. 1-9, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217337
9. T. Williamson, A. Radford and H. Bennetts. Understanding Sustainable Architecture. Spoon Press Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York, 2003.
10. V. S. Der Ryn and S. Cowan. Ecological Design, Tenth Anniversary Edition. Island Press, United States, 2007.
11. P. Mang and B. Reed. Regenerative development and design. In: Encyclopedia Sustainability Science and Technology. John Wiley and Sons, United States, pp. 8855, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_303
12. P. Mang and B. Haggard. Sustainability, Regenerative Development and Design: A Framework for Evolving. John Wiley and Sons, United States, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119149699
13. K. Fujihira. Comprehensive strategy for sustainable housing design. In: Different Strategies of Housing Design. IntechOpen, London, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86278
14. V. Loftness, V. Hartkopf, K. P. Lam, M. Snyder, Y. Hua, Y. Gu, J. H. Choi and X. Yang. Sustainable and healthy built environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 62, p. 102378, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0684-1_197
15. A. Almusaed. Biophilic and Bioclimatic Architecture, Analytical Therapy for the Next Generation of Passive Sustainable Architecture. Springer, New York, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-534-7
16. K. Yeang. The Green Skyscraper: The Basis for Designing Sustainable Intensive Buildings. Prestel Verlag, Munich, 1999.
17. A. Almansuri, D. Dowdle and S. Curwell. Designing a Dwelling Unit in Tripoli - Libya by using Sustainable Architectural Principles. In: Proceedings of The Second International Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development. Amman, Jordan, 2010.
18. B. Widera. Bioclimatic architecture. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 567-578, 2015.
19. M. Košir. Climate Adaptability of Buildings: Bioclimatic Design in the Light of Climate Change. Springer, Berlin, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18456-8
20. D. Watson. Bioclimatic design. In: Sustainable Built Environments, Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 19-42, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0684-1_225
21. K. Gillis and B. Gatersleben. A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 948-963, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948
22. S. R. Kellert and E. F. Calabrese. The Practice of Biophilic Design. Yale University Press, London, 2015.
23. P. Sassi. Strategies for Sustainable Architecture. Routledge, London, 2015.
24. Darko, A. P. C. Chan and E. K. Owusu. What are the green technologies for sustainable housing development? An empirical study in Ghana. Business Strategy and Development, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 140-153, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.18
25. B. Reed. Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research and Information, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 674-682, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701475753
26. B. Dias. Beyond sustainability - biophilic and regenerative design in architecture. European Scientific Journal, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 147– 158, 2015.
27. A. Hamid. Hassan Fathy and Continuity in Islamic Arts and Architecture: The Birth of a New Modern. The American University in Cairo Press, Egypt, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5743/cairo/9789774163418.001.0001
28. M. Poscablo. Improving the Quality of Life for Older Adults in High- Rise Residential Buildings in Urban Honolulu Through Responsive and Adaptive Design. Ph.D. [Dissertation, University of Hawaii, 2017.
29. High Commission for Erbil Citadel Revitalization (HCECR). Nomination of Erbil Citadel for Inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage List. Kurdistan Region, Iraq, 2012.
30. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Erbil Citadel (No. 1437). Available from: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1437
31. Ministry of Housing and Reconstruction. Regulations and Requirements Regarding Social Housing in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Ministry of Housing and Reconstruction, Iraq, n.d.
32. M. A. Kamal and T. Al Shehab. Sustainability through natural cooling: Bioclimatic design and traditional architecture. Study of Civil Engineering and Architecture (SCEA), vol. 3, 2014.
33. N. Yahya. Comparative study of the Middle Eastern vernacular courtyard houses based on the biophilic design patterns. Cihan University-Erbil Scientific Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63-69, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24086/cuesj.v8n1y2024.pp63-69
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nagham I. Yahya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
